How to send: Click Copy Script, open your Florida House/Senate member page, then use their contact form to paste and send. If the form asks for a topic, choose the closest match (e.g., “Redistricting” / “Elections”). Include your city + ZIP.

Subject: Oppose partisan redistricting in Florida

Dear Representative,

I am writing as a Florida voter to express my strong opposition to the current redistricting efforts underway in our state.

Redistricting should serve voters — not political parties or those already in power. The maps now being proposed appear designed to predetermine electoral outcomes, dilute the voices of communities, and weaken meaningful representation. This undermines public trust and violates the spirit, and in some cases the letter, of Florida’s constitutional requirements for fair districts.

Florida’s Constitution is clear that districts must not be drawn to favor or disfavor a political party or incumbent, and must respect communities of interest. When lines are manipulated for partisan advantage, voters lose confidence that their voices matter — and democracy itself is weakened.

I urge you to oppose any redistricting plan that prioritizes political gain over fair representation. Instead, please support transparent, constitutional maps that reflect Florida’s diverse communities and allow voters — not politicians — to choose their leaders.

Your constituents are paying attention, and we will remember whether our elected officials stood up for fair representation and democratic principles.

Thank you for your time and for your service to the people of Florida.

🚨🚨 MAKE SURE YOU SEND THIS MESSAGE TO EVERY SENATOR ON THE COMMITTEE 🚨🚨

How to send (fast): Click Copy Script. Open the committee link above, click each senator’s profile, and email them. Include your city + ZIP so your message is logged as a constituent communication.

Subject: Vote NO on SB 1038 & SB 1040 — Protect Public Funds from Crypto Risk

Dear Senator,

I am writing as a Florida resident to urge you to vote NO on SB 1038 and SB 1040 when they come before the Senate Banking & Insurance Committee.

These bills would create a state cryptocurrency investment fund, exposing taxpayer dollars to highly speculative and volatile crypto markets. Public funds exist to provide stability, security, and long-term benefit to Floridians — not to gamble on assets that have repeatedly collapsed and caused major losses nationwide.

Across the country, cryptocurrency investments have burned pension funds, municipalities, and individual investors due to extreme volatility, fraud, and lack of meaningful consumer protections. Florida should not put public money at risk in markets that are unproven, unstable, and poorly regulated.

Taxpayer funds should be invested conservatively and transparently, with the primary goal of protecting public resources and ensuring fiscal responsibility. Creating a crypto investment fund moves Florida in the opposite direction and exposes residents to unnecessary financial risk.

I urge you to protect Florida taxpayers and vote NO on SB 1038 and SB 1040.

Thank you for your time and consideration.

Sincerely,
[Your Name]
[City], Florida
[ZIP Code]

🚨🚨 MAKE SURE YOU SEND THIS MESSAGE TO EVERY SENATOR ON THE COMMITTEE 🚨🚨

How to send (fast): Click Copy Script. Open the committee link above, click each senator’s profile, and email them. Include your city + ZIP so your message is logged as a constituent communication.

Subject: Vote NO on SB 164 — Protect Reproductive Healthcare and Medical Privacy

Dear Senator,

I am writing as a Florida resident to urge you to vote NO on SB 164 when it comes before the Senate Civil & Criminal Justice Appropriations Committee.

SB 164 would grant fertilized eggs legal rights “as children” from the moment of conception and allow lawsuits related to pregnancy loss. This extreme policy would insert government and the courts into deeply personal medical decisions and create serious legal risks for patients, doctors, and families.

By treating fertilized eggs as legal persons, this bill threatens access to reproductive healthcare, including in vitro fertilization (IVF), miscarriage management, and treatment for pregnancy complications. It risks criminalizing standard medical care and exposing families to investigations or lawsuits during moments of profound loss.

Medical decisions should be guided by patients and healthcare professionals — not politicians or prosecutors. SB 164 would undermine medical privacy, interfere with evidence-based care, and put Florida out of step with accepted medical standards.

This bill has sweeping statewide implications for reproductive healthcare and family planning in Florida. I urge you to protect patient autonomy, medical judgment, and privacy by voting NO on SB 164.

Thank you for your time and consideration.

Sincerely,
[Your Name]
[City], Florida
[ZIP Code]

How to send: Copy the script, open Bean/Scott/Moody contact pages, paste, and send. If asked for an issue area, choose “Elections”, “Voting Rights”, or “Constituent Concern.” Include your city + ZIP.

Subject: Oppose the SAVE Act — Protect the freedom to vote

Dear Representative/Senator [Last Name]:

I am writing as a constituent to urge you to oppose the so-called SAVE Act.

While presented as an election security measure, the SAVE Act would create significant new barriers to voter registration for millions of eligible Americans. Requiring specific citizenship documents to register or update registration would disproportionately harm seniors, students, rural voters, married women who have changed their names, and working people who do not have ready access to these documents.

There is no evidence of widespread non-citizen voting that would justify these restrictions. Instead, the SAVE Act would disenfranchise eligible voters and undermine the fundamental right to vote — a cornerstone of our democracy.

Our elections should be secure and accessible. Policies that suppress participation under the guise of security weaken public trust and silence lawful voters. Congress should be working to expand access to the ballot, not erect new obstacles.

I urge you to publicly oppose the SAVE Act and reject any legislation that restricts lawful voter registration or participation.

Thank you for your time and for representing your constituents.

Sincerely,
[Your Name]
[City, State ZIP]

How to send: Copy the script, open Bean/Scott/Moody contact pages, paste, and send. If the form asks for a topic, pick the closest match (e.g., “Immigration” / “Appropriations” / “Homeland Security”). Include your city + ZIP so it’s logged as a constituent message.

Subject: Refuse DHS funding that fails to rein in ICE and Border Patrol (FY2026)

Dear Representative/Senator:

I urge you to refuse to vote for any appropriations bill for the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) that fails to rein in ICE and Border Patrol and protect our communities.

The killing of Renee Good in Minneapolis on January 7, 2026 underscores what happens when federal immigration enforcement operates without meaningful restrictions and accountability. Congress must use the appropriations process to set enforceable limits before approving any funding.

As a member of Congress, you have the power to curb abuse and protect the public by:

• Refusing to vote for any FY2026 appropriations bill that includes increased funding for ICE or Border Patrol, including funds for detention; and
• Refusing to vote for any DHS funding bill unless it:
  1) Strengthens restrictions on ICE and Border Patrol’s ability to conduct dragnet arrest operations and target people based on race, language or accent, place of employment, or location at the time of apprehension;
  2) Ends Border Patrol deployment to our cities and rejects its ever-expanding mandate in immigration enforcement; and
  3) Limits DHS’s reprogramming and transfer authority — specifically preventing the reprogramming or transferring of funds for detention.

Every member of Congress should insist on real limits and accountability before any DHS funding is approved. I hope to see you standing up for the safety, dignity, and rights of everyone in our communities.

Sincerely,
[Your Name]
[City, State ZIP]

How to send: Copy the script, open Bean/Scott/Moody contact pages, paste, and send. If asked for an issue area, choose “Foreign Affairs,” “National Security,” or “Other.” Include your city + ZIP.

Subject: Congress must block any attempt to take Greenland — no force, no “purchase”

Dear Representative/Senator [Last Name]:

I’m writing to demand that you publicly and unequivocally oppose any effort by President Trump (or any administration) to “take” Greenland — whether by force, coercion, or a so-called purchase.

Greenland’s future belongs to the people of Greenland. Treating territory as a commodity is morally wrong, destabilizing, and a direct threat to our credibility with allies. Any attempt to pressure Denmark or Greenland, threaten force, or bypass the will of Greenlanders would violate core democratic principles and undermine international stability.

Congress has clear tools to stop this:
• Publicly state that the U.S. will not pursue acquisition of Greenland by coercion, force, or any back-channel “deal.”
• Refuse any authorization for the use of force related to Greenland.
• Block or condition any appropriations that could be used to plan, negotiate, or carry out coercive acquisition.
• Demand immediate hearings and written assurances from the administration that it will respect Greenland’s self-determination and allied sovereignty.

Please make your position clear now: no authorization, no funding, and no enabling rhetoric for an imperial-style land grab. I will be watching how you act — and I expect you to defend the rule of law, our alliances, and democratic self-determination.

Sincerely,
[Your Name]